https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to João Paulo from comment #10) Again - please don't forget that not only "it should be done because someone possibly would ever need it" matters, but also "... and making it possible is maintainable - i.e. allows testing that it works". If something is a resource, and its absence breaks functionality, than this is not optional. Built-in things like font substitution expects to find those fonts => they are required for correct operation. Unless someone volunteers to perform complete audit, and also provide extensive set of unit tests to cover "no fonts" scenario -> WF IMO. But removing unnecessary fonts already bundled into LO would be great. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
