https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139701
--- Comment #2 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > The classic toolbar has .uno:UnderlineSingle while the Notebookbar and the > sidebar uses the .uno:Underline command, which provides a more complex menu > button with all kind of underlining options. Do we need this complexity in > the standard UI? This kind of 'depends'. I personally find it 'easy' tool to play with underlining. Which a lot more accessible compared to the dialog approach. I considered it lacking after I encountered inside the tabbed edition. But before I never considered looking for it. So 'traditional' - old skool - approach, this obviously a no go. But well 'it's' only a drop down button. Major complain would be (a) aesthetical; Only Underlining having it.. (b) and the obvious why bold/italic lacking it.. The first encounter would surely be surprise. People obviously clicking the 'drop down' button.. But I would expect the response to be, o nice.. Or else 'shrug', don't need that, but doesn't bother me. But that's me reasoning.. not sure how others perceive this.. I don't see no harm, IMHO. Only advantage.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise