https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140178
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda |
|tion.org |
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Dieter from comment #8)
> From my POV "List & Level" has no advantage compared to "List & Outline".
(In reply to Dieter from comment #9)
> ...change from "Outline & List" to "List & Outline"
Don't see advantage in shuffling the words.
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0)
> "Outline & Numbering" was changed to "Outline & List"
> (a) reduce confusion with "Outline" tab and "Outline" in B&N...
> (b) highlights the important aspect ... namely "Level"
> (c) tabs in "B&N" and "List Style" have a "Level" option
> (d) leave the "Outline" label ...in B&N commonly known
But in the end I believe users don't read those details. In most cases they
glance over the dialog to find a way to "put numbers at the beginning of the
text" having a chapter number in mind (Outline is the whole picture to me, an
overview of the document structure). And less often to make a paragraph a list
(type equally split here). So the keywords are numbering, outline, and list-
and if I spot any of those terms I pick the tab.
Given that outline is kind of a list, how about "List Style"?
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0)
> "Outline & List" -> "Level & List"
The alliteration reads awkward.
Off-topic: No need to CC me to UX topics, I receive and read all messages to
the ux-advice mailing list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
