https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140178
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda | |tion.org | --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #8) > From my POV "List & Level" has no advantage compared to "List & Outline". (In reply to Dieter from comment #9) > ...change from "Outline & List" to "List & Outline" Don't see advantage in shuffling the words. (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > "Outline & Numbering" was changed to "Outline & List" > (a) reduce confusion with "Outline" tab and "Outline" in B&N... > (b) highlights the important aspect ... namely "Level" > (c) tabs in "B&N" and "List Style" have a "Level" option > (d) leave the "Outline" label ...in B&N commonly known But in the end I believe users don't read those details. In most cases they glance over the dialog to find a way to "put numbers at the beginning of the text" having a chapter number in mind (Outline is the whole picture to me, an overview of the document structure). And less often to make a paragraph a list (type equally split here). So the keywords are numbering, outline, and list- and if I spot any of those terms I pick the tab. Given that outline is kind of a list, how about "List Style"? (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > "Outline & List" -> "Level & List" The alliteration reads awkward. Off-topic: No need to CC me to UX topics, I receive and read all messages to the ux-advice mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise