https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134165
--- Comment #8 from Luke Kendall <luke.kend...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #7) > (In reply to Luke Kendall from comment #6) > > My preference, because it would be useful to be able to edit a field, would > > be to make the bug an enhancement (to provide the implied functionality). > > I guess renaming is prevented in order to protect the user from making > mistakes, shooting themselves in the foot. Let's ask UX what they think. > > There is bug 111888 for a variable UX overhaul I'm not sure in what way it could lead to causing the user to create errors, but even if there were, I'd hope the function could either: 1) check and adjust to use the new edited value wherever it was previously used, or 2) offer to create a new field with the new properties. In either case, if there's only a single use, I suspect no errors could be caused. But you would all know better than me about the consequences and effects. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise