https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154831
--- Comment #11 from maison <bugzi...@kgb.ovh> --- Thanks for the update, but having the empty field is not les destructive than having it populated with any other value, as you can still replace your data with an empty string if you accidentally click the Replace buttons. If you want to avoid potential damage (if someone can’t undo), then it should be the search string to be reset, not the replace string. It’ll be a peculiarity for LO compared to other software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
