https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158715

--- Comment #15 from John Mills <jmill...@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Rene Engelhard from comment #13)
> > Are you trolling Rene or serious?
> 
> serious.
> 
> > when you don't care for ensuring LibreOffice is safe by design and 
> > execution.
> 
> That's a bogus accusation.
> I do. 
> 
> That's why I maintain it in Debian and that's why I prepared the stable
> updates I mentioned in my link. As do other distributors. No need to do
> anything here on Linux. There's no need to phone home for security updates,
> it actually is harmful ("but I have 7.4.7 patched with security issues, but
> the application says 'get 7.6.4'")
> 
> Windows might be different but here 99.9% are in the "I can't admin my
> machine properly" category.
> 
> LibreOffice does care too, that's why those issues were fixed and announced.
> There's also update ttbomk.

I'm not questioning your personal opinion as such. The issue is mainly for
Windows users that are an order of magnitude larger than both Linux and MacOS.
Currently there is no mechanism to ensure they are on a safe and supported
versions of LibreOffice.

They are "orphaned" there is no way even to inform them that LibreOffice is a
potential risk that could compromise their whole system. It is unacceptable to
simply state they should update. Find a way to tell them that then maybe they
might do.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to