https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153979
--- Comment #5 from Klaus <bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3) > Would agree with populating a listing [ALL] for common use, where a majority > of current replacements across all locales/supported langs should be > consolidated and delivered. > > Then the delivered locale/lang specific autocorrection listings could be > reduced. As a user, another advantage would be making customization easier. For instance, I write documents in German and English and if I want to customize language-independent auto-replacements like :alpha:, I need to manually do so for each language that I use. > The [All] listing of corrections is present, but empty. Requiring user > action to populate. > > Don't see a need to invest in a [None]. Please keep in mind, that currently [All] and [None] are somehow conflated, with replacement rules defined for [All] being applied to text with language [None], but to no other language. (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #1) > I beg to differ: > [None] means exactly that, _no language tool processing at all_. > > [All] should be processed in, well, all languages except [None]. Currently, my use-case can be made to work with the workaround of 1. Editing the auto-corrections for English (USA) and [All] to ensure that ~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/autocorr/acor_en-US.dat ~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/autocorr/acor_und.dat both exists. 2. Close LibreOffice. 3. Replace acor_und.dat by a copy of acor_en-US.dat. This workaround works, because currently the replacement rules for [All] are actually used for [None] text. If in the future [None] text uses no auto-correction rules at all, the workaround will not work anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.