https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154434
V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
| |861,
| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
| |5282,
| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
| |2204
CC| |vsfo...@libreoffice.org
Blocks| |103302
--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> ---
Review the see also list for discussion of what would be needed to move forward
from the LO filter support of HTML4.0 transitional and CSS 1.1 styling, to make
LO relevant for current W3C/WHATWG web standards.
There are ongoing suggestions to remove the Writer Web module. And to instead
improve the import filters for importing to Writer, Draw, Impress, or Calc as
ODF only documents. With corresponding export filter work to render ODF back to
web content.
The utility of LibreOffice as an HTML4 editor continues to degrade.
So there is nothing actionable here for the HTML of the OP (and here we simply
don't handle the class= positioning of the embedded css on filter import).
IMHO => NAB and => WF for any effort to address this single issue.
Dev's with UX-advise agreement should decide what to do with the Writer Web
module.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
[Bug 103302] [META] Writer's web layout/view bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
