https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353
--- Comment #3 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > To sum up, a) there is no unique order in Calc True > b) sorting needs to be optional. Well a list has a top down order order by definition. So images listed in the navigator are sorted anyhow. So it's not clear what you want to convey by optional. I don't necessary intend to insert some sort filter with various options. More the adjust the default logic to make it more predictable. In similar fashion as in Writer. Arranging images by insertion time a large spreadsheet with lots of images (>50) simply random. Same as image creation time. Or sorting by filename. You have filename if insert with Insert -> Image, in case of copy paste you get something like: image27. I don't expect people to be really conscious about image file names in general. Look the sample document. Row by row seems to more sensible. So first image A1, next image in B1, 2C..followed by row 2, column A; A2; B2; C2. This makes the arrangement at least predictable. This use-full results for non-complex spreadsheets with where one column being filled with images (like example), which I think being a rather common use-case. The current order in unproductive in any case, IMHO. --- What might work is an alternative view option listing the images visible in the view port. This is useful if images being distributed across plenty of columns on the same row; however not sure of need for it. Seems a bit excessive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.