https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164084
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Besides, the term "relative" is not suited here since we can specify font > size, for instance (or entirely?), in hierarchical relation via percent. I'm not following. Font-relative spacing is relative to the font size even if that font size itself is defined relatively to something else. > AFAIK, you get ch units only if CJK is enabled and is the default in this > case. I see no need to make this more obvious for anyone. Let's put CJK and even RTL aside for a second. Don't you agree that it is useful to users to know that they can use either fixed-size spacing or font-size-relative spacing? If not, can you explain why users would rarely be interested in font-size-relative spacing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
