https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159227
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|1 |0 Keywords| |needsUXEval Status|REOPENED |UNCONFIRMED CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org --- Comment #11 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jan Lachnitt from comment #10) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9) > > Ok, reading bug 155957 and bug 159572, this is an intentional decision. Jan > > wants the previous behaviour, but it could lead to confusing situations. > > Thank you for the references. > > I see that the original font must be preserved if the character is in a > private use area. But otherwise I would use the present font, to prevent > unwanted and unnecessary (and ugly) font mixing. Ok, so you are asking for more complex logic in the code. Let's ask what the UX team thinks. I wonder how expensive performance-wise such a scanning operation would be. There can be lots of glyphs in a font... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
