https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169480
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] |desktop.org | Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org |tion.org Blocks| |115673 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jim Raykowski from comment #9) > I think it's an improvement over the old behavior. Possibly Forward > navigation should also have the same behavior. The request sounds rather diluting the idea of recency navigation. But OTOH it's hard to imagine scenarios where you want to go from recent #2 to #3 while having scrolled away from #2. So no string objection from my side. I would expect to get the cursor actually the active recent position into the view whether going forward or backward. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115673 [Bug 115673] [META] Navigate By toolbar control bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
