https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170092
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Blocks| |170353 Keywords|needsUXEval | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org |tion.org --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. While we should not categorically "reject AI", and any possibility of using it ever - we should also not abstractly, generally, "accept AI", and decide we're sticking LLMs into LibreOffice. Microsoft is going the way of making Office "The AI app", and this seems to be perceived badly even by users. We should take more of the opposite route: The no-AI-slop Office suite. Access to LLM's on the market, with all known flaws, including the Ollama approach should be done via extension (see https://extensions.libreoffice.org/?Tags%5B%5D=177 for existing solutions). So this request is a WF. But we welcome local or ethical managed LLMs (once those exist). And "AI" solutions for specific use cases too, of course. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170353 [Bug 170353] [META] Integration of AI / LLM into LibreOffice -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
