Michael Meeks wrote: > Does that mean we should use some of the boost system abstractions > instead of our own home-brewed ones where appropriate - perhaps ;-) - is > that what underlies the question ? clearly if they perform better it'd > be lovely - is there some low-hanging fruit here ? I was wondering if we > could inline & perhaps optimise out lots of atomic referencing > operations around the place :-) > Nah, this was prompted by the array-detection magic from Caolan, of which I was reminded of a nice boost::type_traits helper using a similar technique. No particular plans to replace anything - just a bunch of useful helpers we could now use at places ...
-- Thorsten
pgpD3X0nkqC9p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice