Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> - Module readlicense_oo needs to be modified to not produce them. Patch
> is in git (and reverted again).
oh - shame - why reverted ?
> - Module scp2 needs to be modified to not copy them. Patch is in git
> (and reverted again)
Ditto ;-) you do realise scp2's dependencies are rather sub-par, it is
well worth removing unxlngi6.pro in scp2/ at a whim.
> - instsetoo_native then complained about a missing
> LICENSE-EN_es.html.orig or something, even after I had done a make
> clean. Not sure where that came from. Perhaps a reboot would have
> fixed it (our environment variable fudging is amazing).
Reboots ? just start a new clean login shell (in an xterm eg.) would be
just as good; it is ~impossible for one shell to corrupt another's
environment (unless it is its child).
> So I had to revert this. If someone tackles it, can we put the README
> and LICENSE in the existing directories please? Currently 8 out of 13
> topdir entries in our installation refer to some readme or license.
Right - this is really silly. And for the bundled extensions there is
no need to have separate licenses either, nor a separate license per
language IMHO.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
