On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: >> So, >> >> As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in >> parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented >> features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering: >> >> would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? > > That's surely a terrible idea. Now we default to building something > which isn't the same as what will realistically be deployed, Base won't > work out of box and all java extensions won't work.
I have no sympathy for Java but I agree with Caolan's argument. Norbert > > C. > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice