On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:49:27AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > Urk; another reason not to use BOOL I guess :-) > > What does your iodbcunix.h include ? I guess we might need to do some > hideous #define magic for the iodbcunix.h headers here: did you get a > solution ?
Not yet. > I might be tempted to do: > > #define BOOL IODBC_BOOL > #include <iodbcunix.h> > #undef BOOL If I only knew where it's included. > or somesuch, if this is the only conflict. Is a general sal_Bool -> Bool, sal_True -> true, sal_False -> false replacement ok? Then we could remove that type... Thomas _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
