> If the feature were more clearly separated I'd suggest we back-port > fixes more aggressively to the stable branch (since it is clearly > flagged as experimental). Maybe, but visual editor in stable branch is fairly stable (e.g. doesn't crash)... The stuff in master isn't as well tested, yet... But I'll keep it in mind... :)
> Having said that - if we have any fixes for regressions that are not > working when the feature is not enabled - we should back-port them: are > there any ? I'm not aware of any regressions when experimental features are disabled... -- Regards Jonas Finnemann Jensen. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 15:39, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:12 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: >> > I have installed RC2 now, but I see no difference in formula editor. >> >> I don't think everything from master is merged into the release candidate... >> And since this is still an experimental feature we're slow at pushed >> things out... > > Right :-) best to test this on master; hopefully when turned off it > doesn't cause too much grief, and this is getting us some useful bug / > testing feedback :-) > > If the feature were more clearly separated I'd suggest we back-port > fixes more aggressively to the stable branch (since it is clearly > flagged as experimental). > > Having said that - if we have any fixes for regressions that are not > working when the feature is not enabled - we should back-port them: are > there any ? > > Thanks, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
