On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 09:44 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Caolan - are you happy for this: > > commit 6c01edfe66d6e350b20178d9ab367806d956cb46 > > Author: Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> > > Date: Thu Nov 11 13:31:33 2010 +0000 > > Resolves: #i25247#, #i25561#, #i48064#, #i92341# CTL/Other Default > > Font > > to go to libreoffice-3-3 ? if so, I guess that's fine without > further > > review; at least it looks like an Oracle patch to me - 'ftcAsci' eg. ;-) > Its my patch, so I'm happy with it by definition, and someone else > probably needs to do a quick review of it. "ftcAsci" is the spelling > used in the MS docs for this (IIRC), not mine. > The intention for my original post is two fold:- 1) I'd like to know when/which-version will this fix land in. 2) I'd like to understand the policy for development vs. release branches. For example, which committed patches will be in the 3.3.1 or 3.4 release. How things like this are planned/decided (which used to be group by child workspaces before). -- _/|\_ Samphan Raruenrom. Open Source Development Co., Ltd. Tel: +66 38 311816, Fax: +66 38 773128, http://www.osdev.co.th/
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
