On 18/02/11 16:55, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 17:46 +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
Having said this, if someone has submitted lots of patches under
explicit LGPLv3+/MPL remark, and submitted another patch without
mentioning of the license, we may just assume that it is under the same
license as with his previous patches. But that's sort of a gray area.
I've seen people just make statements like
"'this' patch and subsequent patches can be considered to be LGPLv3+/MPL
unless stated otherwise"
Noel
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
