On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:03:25 -0500 Kohei Yoshida <kyosh...@novell.com> wrote:
> Yeah, although if you have to type a lot of it along with UNO_QUERY it > becomes a bit cumbersome to type > > uno::Reference<container::XFoo> xSomeRef(SomeThing, uno::UNO_QUERY); > > instead of > > Reference<container::XFoo> xSomeRef(SomeThing, UNO_QUERY); > > Especially these two symbols are used a lot when you work in a code > that is heavily UNO-centric. > > Still, I agree with the removal of using namespace > com::sun::star::uno. I'm just not sure about spelling out the > uno::Reference part... My thinking is that, if the existing file > already specifies "using com::sun::star::uno::Reference", then I'd > rather we leave that as-is rather than replacing each use of > Reference with uno::Reference. Yes. I updated it on the wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development%2FEasy_Hacks&action=historysubmit&diff=15954&oldid=15847 Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
