Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 09:10 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
I have still problems building from tar source. Actual situation:
All modules folders are put into one root folder.
That is odd; and/or annoying. If you want the best, most stable, and
useful branch to hack on; I would personally recommend the:
libreoffice-3-4
tag in git - we can still get fixes included there, and it should
compile and run on anything.
Is there a reason for using the tars ? [ of course, they should work
too - but - it is hard to isolate that the problem is not specific to
them ].
It is the way I'm used to do in OOo. For OOo I would have to install
something like TortoiseSVN, which slows down my computer noticeable. So
I did not use it. I do not work fast, and trying to be "uptodate" all
time, is impossible to me. I only build three or four times a year. I
worked on a project often up to 3 month. When it was ready, I got the
actual OOo version, transfered my solution to that version and generated
the patch.
Actual I try to get a LO build to transfer and test my spline solutions,
which work already in my DEV300m106 build.
It looks like some nasty symbol visibility problem on Windows.
Tor - any ideas ?
I have some further observation: I had tried a non-pro build. Today I
have deleted the --enable-dbgutil switch and started a new build. Now it
compiles xml2cmp without problems. Currently it is in hwpfilter. I can
tell you tomorrow, whether building was successful. I do not use -P
option to avoid any problems coming from parallelism, so compiling is slow.
Perhaps the problems have their reason in --enable-dbgutil ?
Kind regards
Regina
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
