On 17.11.2014 06:21, Robinson Tryon wrote: > To make it easier to keep track of what we've extended in ODF (and > what has been proposed to OASIS vs. added to the next version of ODF > vs. been implemented in LO, etc..) I thought up a few new columns to > add to our table that lists all LibreOffice extensions to ODF: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes#List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_extensions > > This update should make it easier for both devs and users to keep > track of our ODF extensions, and to help them understand what features > will be lost if documents are saved as ODF 1.2 vs. ODF 1.2 Extended. >
> Here's the extended list of columns: sounds nice, except: > ! ODF Version(s) Extended <!-- e.g. 1.2+ --> this should generally be the latest ODF version that the LO release supports, and if you select to store your files in a specific, non-extended version in Tools->Options you don't (or at least shouldn't) get any extensions... so what's the benefit of tracking this? > ! Validation Errors <!-- Any errors/warnings this feature will > trigger in an ODF validator, or "none" --> i'm not sure if this is so useful - you can tell the validator if you want to check strictly against the schema or allow extensions: -c: Check conformance (default for ODF 1.2 documents) -e: Check extended conformance (ODF 1.2 documents only) if the extensions are properly name-spaced then validation with -e should not report any errors, and validating a document stored as "extended" with strict conformance will inevitably report problems, so don't do that. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice