On 01/25/2015 02:23 PM, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
*** CID 1266445: Explicit null dereferenced (FORWARD_NULL) /cppuhelper/source/component_context.cxx: 747 in cppu::ComponentContext::disposing()() 741 &envs, &envCount, &rtl_allocateMemory, OUString("java").pData); 742 assert(envCount >= 0); 743 assert(envCount == 0 || envs != nullptr); 744 for (sal_Int32 i = 0; i != envCount; ++i) { 745 assert(envs[i] != nullptr); 746 assert(envs[i]->dispose != nullptr);CID 1266445: Explicit null dereferenced (FORWARD_NULL) Dereferencing null pointer "envs".747 (*envs[i]->dispose)(envs[i]);
What was the state of these builds again, they're implicitly --disable-debug, --disable-assert-always-abort, and making them --enable-debug would run out of resources? Could they be made --enable-assert-always-abort, in the hope that that would silence the above false positive (or would that need some explicit coverity comment annotation anyway)?
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
