Hello, I got this comment of a cppcheck developper : is this objective c++? Can the code be replaced in the tokenizer with plain C++ somehow?
He seems to be right about objective C++. Then I made a opengrok research, 4 files use "@try". Perhaps, there are other files which use "@ expression", since @try and @catch are not the only "@ expressions". What's the best thing to do : - to keep objective C++ parts ? - to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ? Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cppcheck-defect-when-is-present-tp3324103p3326563.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
