On 11/28/2011 11:25 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On the other hand; I'd (personally) prefer to use some defines to create the 'override' and 'final' keywords (as they will be in future). Defining them to 'virtual' or even empty would do, if they are not present in the compiler. cf. glib's provision of a stock 'inline'.That should help reduce code thrash, and hideous ugliness ;-) keeping us closer to more readable, standard C++.
One nitpick: While it would keep the code surely more readable, it would make it less standard. For one, override and final are technically not keywords in C++11, so a correct program that used them as identifiers would be broken if we defined them to be empty (for a compiler not yet supporting them). For another, if override and final /were/ keywords, defining them in any way would result in undefined behaviour.
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
