> I'm interest in the time a change was committed to the central > repository by a developer
But developers don't commit to the central repository. They commit to their local "clones" of it, and then at some (much) later stage push outstanding commits to the central repository. And then there are feature branches and merges... > Fixes applied to the 3.4 branch were added back to the master (I > hope). In this case (and usually) it is the other way around: Fixes are done on master, and those deemed good and important are "cherry-picked" to a stable branch. (Although technically, as we use different repository structure for master and 3-4 (single "core" vs. a bunch), it isn't a cherry-pick.) --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice