On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:57:58 +0100 Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 03:58 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: > > I would not like to see a new configure flag for doxygen, the odk flag > > suffices; > > generate the documentation anyway. Otherwise it is always good to use > > standards. > > Do you mean, those who do not have doxygen and don't want to or can't > install it should use --disable-odk (i.e., do not build SDK at all) > instead of --without-doxygen (i.e., build SDK but without C++ > documentation)? Doxygen won't be shipped with LO source like all the other 3rd parties?! Interesting ... > And what do you mean with "generate the documentation anyway"? If doxygen is there, you can use it anyway. > > If the generation has to be configurable, chain it to --with-help or > > --with-helppack-integration or so?! > I'd say these are rather unrelated, so would prefer not to combine them. One kind of help for a developer is what doxygen generates I would say. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
