>>some labels paper that I bought last year were not symmetric.... >I found that too when I started to extend the label defintions (1700+ ...) in >labels.xcu with paper height and paper width. >And also that by rounding off the calculated paper size can differ +/- 2mm >from the actual size, especially when the labels >are small.
Of the 1789 label definitions (including cards), 1418 are symmetrical and of standard paper size (A4, A5 or Letter). The remaining 371 have either unusual/incorrect dimensions or are not symmetrical. This encourages me to continue with the enhancement of including pper size in the labels.xcu file. A question therefore: What is best: -to use bug 36874 (state resolved fixed) for this thread -to create a new bug (with reference to 36874) -use this list for all comments/discussion etc.? I think it would be good to have the comments together (traceable). Wise men, please advise :) And another question: many labeldefinitions in labels.xcu have German descriptions (e.g. from manufacturer Herma). Should these be translated to English? :( Winfried _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
