On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:39 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 02/13/2012 06:18 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > >> Noob's question: > > A function that is only used by an inline function will be treated as > > unused by callcatcher? Or is it a result of compiler's optimizations?
Yeah, gcc, even in -O0, doesn't generate code for inlines that aren't used, and callcatcher is a simple scraper of the assembler output of gcc. So gcc never told callcatcher that the inline existed seeing as nothing made gcc emit code for it. The other similar one that can happen is code like... if (1) //or something equivalent do_a() else do_b(); and you get "do_b" in the unused list. I kind of like getting those ones. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
