Hi, On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:50:06AM +0800, Markus Mohrhard > <markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Is there still a reason to have independent unitcheck and slowcheck > > targets? They are historically different because a default module level > > make would only execute the unitcheck and not the slowcheck target but if a > > module level make is not executing a unitcheck anymore, slowcheck can just > > be merged into unitcheck. > > I think you're right, that could be simplified once the above change > goes in.
And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then be done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?) and would be a good rationale to rename https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO) Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
