On 03/20/2012 03:29 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:20 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 20 of March 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 13:39 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(And even if immutable classes are
generally also a good idea in C++, esp. in combination with
multi-threading, the mutable rtl::OUString::operator= spoils this,
anyway.)
And the += operator irritates me.
Before I start experimenting with more stuff in OUString that might look a
bit like operator+= , what exactly is so irritating about operator= or
operator+= in OUString and why?
It's just that if OUString was supposed to be immutable, then a
foo += bar; "feels wrong" to me in some vague way that, I guess
bizarrely, foo = foo + bar doesn't. *shrug*
To me, both look equally wrong if OUString is considered immutable, and
equally OK if it isn't.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
