Hi, > I don't want to spoil the fun much for you :) , but I expect the > number of > string allocations to go down when RTL_CONSTASCII_* stops being used > in favor > of string literals, and further down after whenever I get to > implementing the > efficient operator+. So you may be profiling a problem for a part of > which a > solution already exists.
Just curious: what's the big difference between rtl::OUString and std::string ? I guess a good toolchain (compiler+stdlibs) can do a lot of optimizations, which it cannot with an own implementation. For example, if we have lots of static strings (literals, or statically initialized and const std::string objects), it could put them all together into one instance in const data section. I doubt that is possible with own classes without compiler support. cu _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
