On Tuesday 03 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 17:52 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 of April 2012, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > (SAL_REINTERPRET_CAST is not used anywhere, says opengrok, so that can > > > be binned outright.) > > > > Stuff from sal/ is public API, so you should not remove anything from > > there or you might break backwards compatibility for somebody (the fix is > > trivial here, but still). > > True, true - but pragmatically if you have an old extension, that you > want to work on lots of older OpenOffice.org's / LibreOffices you'll > want to build with an old SDK, since the new ones automagically require > a newer LibreOffice.
Although this may seem like being overly pedantic, it's quite possible that there is an extension that simply still uses the macro in the code just as a relic of the past, even though otherwise it would have no problem with recent SDK. And the cost in LO is leaving one simple macro in, compared to a possibly massive search&replace. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice