On 04/13/2012 11:35 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
No, as already detailed by Michael.
I'm willing to write a configure test to add the --no-as-needed flag if
someone can point me in the right direction.
I can follow the configure.in syntax easily enough, but what would be
the easiest way to test for the fact that the linker is defaulting to
--as-needed?
I would still prefer to simply insist on Ubuntu fixing their tool chain.
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writing_warning-free_code#When_all_else_fails>
"NOTE: The ld --as-needed default was reverted for the final natty
release, and will be re-enabled in the o-series." This at least seems
to indicate that Ubuntu is aware their move is not without problems.
Noel, do you happen to be affected because you are on a pre-final natty
release (whatever that is)?
Björn, do you know anything about this Ubuntu-specific thing, or anyone
within Ubuntu we could discuss that with?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
