> i'm not all that familiar with how MachO linker works (other than its > fancy install_names :).
You mean the weird @__________________________________________________ stuff? I think that is something we can get rid of once we stop supporting 10.4. > would be nice if we could get rid of that ancient compiler; is it > possible to use something newer while targeting 10.4? I am not sure, but I think it should be. I tried that some time last year, building with a current compiler but attempting to tell it to produce binaries that will run on 10.4. I don't recall how far I got, probably something more important and/or interesting intervened, and in any case I don't have any machine running 10.4 to test the result on ;) --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
