framework/inc/uifactory/configurationaccessfactorymanager.hxx |    3 +
 framework/source/uifactory/uielementfactorymanager.cxx        |   20 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit d54a1380d13d8d832841cdc33440aac2e14d3300
Author:     Noel Grandin <noelgran...@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Nov 21 12:03:13 2021 +0200
Commit:     Noel Grandin <noel.gran...@collabora.co.uk>
CommitDate: Sun Nov 21 19:42:48 2021 +0100

    osl::Mutex->std::mutex in ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager
    
    Change-Id: I0e7a6eb4700e1108b31dfdf8681e8f4743ab7c5d
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125618
    Tested-by: Jenkins
    Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.gran...@collabora.co.uk>

diff --git a/framework/inc/uifactory/configurationaccessfactorymanager.hxx 
b/framework/inc/uifactory/configurationaccessfactorymanager.hxx
index 7b12048e1223..9f710d235c8d 100644
--- a/framework/inc/uifactory/configurationaccessfactorymanager.hxx
+++ b/framework/inc/uifactory/configurationaccessfactorymanager.hxx
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include <cppuhelper/implbase.hxx>
 #include <rtl/ustring.hxx>
 
+#include <mutex>
 #include <string_view>
 #include <unordered_map>
 
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ class ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager final : public 
::cppu::WeakImplHelper<
 
         bool impl_getElementProps( const css::uno::Any& rElement, OUString& 
rType, OUString& rName, OUString& rModule, OUString& rServiceSpecifier ) const;
 
-        mutable osl::Mutex           m_aMutex;
+        mutable std::mutex           m_aMutex;
         OUString                     m_aPropType;
         OUString                     m_aPropName;
         OUString                     m_aPropModule;
diff --git a/framework/source/uifactory/uielementfactorymanager.cxx 
b/framework/source/uifactory/uielementfactorymanager.cxx
index 029d8790943f..a8c40552609f 100644
--- a/framework/source/uifactory/uielementfactorymanager.cxx
+++ b/framework/source/uifactory/uielementfactorymanager.cxx
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager( const Re
 ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::~ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager()
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     Reference< XContainer > xContainer( m_xConfigAccess, UNO_QUERY );
     if ( xContainer.is() )
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::~ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager()
 OUString 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::getFactorySpecifierFromTypeNameModule( 
std::u16string_view rType, const OUString& rName, std::u16string_view rModule ) 
const
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     FactoryManagerMap::const_iterator pIter =
         m_aFactoryManagerMap.find( getHashKeyFromStrings( rType, rName, 
rModule ));
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ OUString 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::getFactorySpecifierFromTypeNameModu
 void ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::addFactorySpecifierToTypeNameModule( 
std::u16string_view rType, std::u16string_view rName, std::u16string_view 
rModule, const OUString& rServiceSpecifier )
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     OUString aHashKey = getHashKeyFromStrings( rType, rName, rModule );
 
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::addFactorySpecifierToTypeNameModule( st
 void 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::removeFactorySpecifierFromTypeNameModule( 
std::u16string_view rType, std::u16string_view rName, std::u16string_view 
rModule )
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     OUString aHashKey = getHashKeyFromStrings( rType, rName, rModule );
 
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ void 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::removeFactorySpecifierFromTypeNameModul
 Sequence< Sequence< PropertyValue > > 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::getFactoriesDescription() const
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     Sequence< Sequence< PropertyValue > > aSeqSeq;
 
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void SAL_CALL 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::elementInserted( const Contain
     OUString   aService;
 
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     if ( impl_getElementProps( aEvent.Element, aType, aName, aModule, aService 
))
     {
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void SAL_CALL 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::elementRemoved ( const Contain
     OUString   aService;
 
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     if ( impl_getElementProps( aEvent.Element, aType, aName, aModule, aService 
))
     {
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void SAL_CALL 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::elementReplaced( const Contain
     OUString   aService;
 
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     if ( impl_getElementProps( aEvent.Element, aType, aName, aModule, aService 
))
     {
@@ -253,14 +253,14 @@ void SAL_CALL 
ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::disposing( const EventObject&
 {
     // SAFE
     // remove our reference to the config access
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
     m_xConfigAccess.clear();
 }
 
 void ConfigurationAccess_FactoryManager::readConfigurationData()
 {
     // SAFE
-    osl::MutexGuard g(m_aMutex);
+    std::unique_lock g(m_aMutex);
 
     if ( !m_bConfigAccessInitialized )
     {

Reply via email to