editeng/source/outliner/outliner.cxx | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
New commits: commit 6842e0f786c7f3fc859bd7337427d7a4b37befed Author: Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> AuthorDate: Sat Feb 19 20:43:33 2022 +0000 Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fit...@ubuntu.com> CommitDate: Mon Feb 21 13:23:28 2022 +0100 tdf#147166 EditTextObjectImpl copy ctor doesn't exactly copy EditTextObjectImpl and this is apparently relied on, so eliding the copy gives unexpected results. EditTextObjectImpl::Clone returns a copy of *this, but the EditTextObjectImpl copy ctor explicitly does not copy the "PortionInfo" member, so in: commit fb8973f31f111229be5184f4e4223e963ced2c7b Author: Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> Date: Sat Oct 10 19:21:38 2020 +0100 ofz#23492 the only user of this ctor throws away the original of the clone so we can take ownership of the original instead where the copy was optimized away we want from a state where there was a new EditTextObjectImpl with an empty PortionInfo member to one where the PortionInfo of the EditTextObjectImpl was retained. So explicitly clear this unwanted info. It's very hard to make rational judgements about code if a copy behaves differently than the orignal :-( Change-Id: I642d60841d6bdccbf830f8a2ccdbd9f542a8aa18 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/130158 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fit...@ubuntu.com> diff --git a/editeng/source/outliner/outliner.cxx b/editeng/source/outliner/outliner.cxx index d50bdc9b3895..00b5ff202992 100644 --- a/editeng/source/outliner/outliner.cxx +++ b/editeng/source/outliner/outliner.cxx @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ std::optional<OutlinerParaObject> Outliner::CreateParaObject( sal_Int32 nStartPa aParagraphDataVector[nPara-nStartPara] = *GetParagraph(nPara); } + xText->ClearPortionInfo(); // tdf#147166 the PortionInfo is unwanted here OutlinerParaObject aPObj(std::move(xText), std::move(aParagraphDataVector), bIsEditDoc); aPObj.SetOutlinerMode(GetOutlinerMode());