Hmmm, looks like I get the same problem when I run the setup using the
install at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/lode.

Here's the end of the process:

./setup --dev --force
...
Check directory 'mirrors' ... : Created
Cloning into bare repository 'core.git'...
remote: Counting objects: 3260078, done
remote: Finding sources: 100% (3258684/3258684)
error: object 144c7a2e1d711e13422a5c84b34ac33b1d940034:
missingSpaceBeforeEmail: invalid author/committer line - missing space
before email
fatal: fsck error in packed object
Error Cloning mirror...

I did try the following on the original clone and it worked:

git clone --config transfer.fsckobjects=false --config
receive.fsckobjects=false --config fetch.fsckobjects=false
https://github.com/LibreOffice/core.git


On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:42 PM Tim Daley <timda...@earthling.net> wrote:

> So I should use the github repo? If so, that fails, too:
>
> gh repo clone LibreOffice/core
> Cloning into 'core'...
> remote: Enumerating objects: 5821827, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (761/761), done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (482/482), done.
> error: object 657924e4d73d6d501c9a3ceaf62e29b8f243cead:
> missingSpaceBeforeEmail: invalid author/committer line - missing space
> before email
> fatal: fsck error in packed object
> fatal: fetch-pack: invalid index-pack output
> signal: broken pipe
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:50 AM Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 05.07.22 um 16:06 schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
>> > Fatal:
>> >
>> /Users/tim.daley/AixNPanes/libreoffice-7.4.0.0.beta1/schema/libreoffice/OpenDocument-v1.3+libreoffice-manifest-schema.rng:
>>
>> >
>> > file does not exist
>> >
>> > Guess you're using a tarball to build - the schema files are not added
>> > to the tarballs.
>> > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/28494
>> >
>> > I don't remember the reason why they were added to the ignore list,
>> > maybe Thorsten remembers...
>>
>> Because they are non-free and I *do* want to use the tarball with the
>> signature instead of having to repackage it to remove them...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Rene
>>
>>

Reply via email to