sw/source/core/bastyp/swcache.cxx | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits: commit b2ce5ce87ecbaf4fcfc0f7341110f35c780cefb3 Author: Noel Grandin <noel.gran...@collabora.co.uk> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 30 10:33:49 2022 +0200 Commit: Noel Grandin <noel.gran...@collabora.co.uk> CommitDate: Tue Aug 30 16:01:00 2022 +0200 OSL_ENSURE->assert in SwCacheObj if these overflow, we will get more serious problems further down the line. Rather assert here. Change-Id: I70f27edb7c61a0c622a9f8fcb2e1eb075966ac59 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/139035 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.gran...@collabora.co.uk> diff --git a/sw/source/core/bastyp/swcache.cxx b/sw/source/core/bastyp/swcache.cxx index 1affca644884..7f44352beab6 100644 --- a/sw/source/core/bastyp/swcache.cxx +++ b/sw/source/core/bastyp/swcache.cxx @@ -471,13 +471,13 @@ SwCacheObj::~SwCacheObj() #ifdef DBG_UTIL void SwCacheObj::Lock() { - OSL_ENSURE( m_nLock < UCHAR_MAX, "Too many Locks for CacheObject." ); + assert( m_nLock < UCHAR_MAX && "Too many Locks for CacheObject." ); ++m_nLock; } void SwCacheObj::Unlock() { - OSL_ENSURE( m_nLock, "No more Locks available." ); + assert( m_nLock && "No more Locks available." ); --m_nLock; } #endif