On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 09:21 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Fridrich Strba > <fridrich.st...@graduateinstitute.ch> wrote: > > Hello, I cherry-picked with my signoff to 3-6 and 3-5. We need 2 more > > people for 3-5-5 > > Looks OK, +1 from me -- one more still needed.
Sigh - I don't like it. In theory we can "do this right" (TM) - the concept of just ignoring all X errors is IMHO busted and leads to bad X programming. OTOH - adding more XSync's at the necessary places reduces performance I guess. If we purely used gtk+'s calls instead of hard-coding X calls in tons of places, we wouldn't have this problem - yet fixing that is really hard in the gtk2 code I guess. For gtk3 this is an abomination that shouldn't be there, but ... I guess we'll have to do this for -3-5, deeply as it sucks. Sigh, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice