Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my mistake. As for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but that was an email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to respond despite the length.
I had another side question, the response to the thread was made here: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cleaning-bug-list-td3988836i20.html#a3991106 I never got an email about the response, instead it was only part of the digest. Is this the norm because the response was made through nabble? I was just lucky that I read the digest and saw that there was a response, otherwise that person would have never heard back from me about all of his concerns. Thanks again for the feedback, I think this topic is about exhausted at least for now. I'll get something up on the site where you suggested as well as a little blurb about it unless Rainer suggests otherwise. Joel On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Joel Madero píše v Út 19. 06. 2012 v 13:36 -0700: > > I moved this to a new thread because the subject here didn't really > > accurately portray the direction of the conversation > > The mail includes many good questions and proposals that might move us > forward. I'll try to answer it later this week. > > Just a hint. In the future, I suggest to do NOT solve too many problems > in one mail. Too long mails are discouraging. They are hard to read > after few replies. I write such mails from time to time as well and I am > always told that they are hard to handle ;-) > > In addition, I suggest to use formatting using spaces and tabs. Some > people use text-only mail clients (pine) and they do not see the bold > text :-) > > Finally, we need to add libreoffice-qa mailing list into CC for replies > to the other mail. It is affecting the QA job. > > > but I wanted to say I have uploaded the latest flowchard: > > > > > > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/06/Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg > > > > > > I wasn't sure how or if I needed a wiki page or if I should just link > > to the jpg in the Useful Links section of the Bug Triage wiki page. > > Any thoughts? If you could respond on the other thread (more accurate > > subject) that would be great, if not here is fine. Thanks all for the > > input, I think that this is at least a decent start. > > I would add it instead of > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Severity > and add extra step for this into the BugTriage process. > I hope that Rainer is not against. > > Thanks for the nice flowchart and working on triaging the bugs. > > > Best Regards, > Petr > > > >
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice