On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > that makes sense in general, but (to my non-legally-trained eyes) it > looks like this patch is so simple that it very likely doesn't meet the > threshold of creativity that is required to be eligible for copyright > protection in the first place
I don't want to go there really. Please just re-implement the fix in a different way - and/or if this is a really key-fix we can re-base that one file in 3.6. I'm glad author E-mails are going into svn these days - we can use them in future post the re-base to ensure crediting / affiliations etc. are correctly given. ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice