sw/source/core/undo/rolbck.cxx | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 100ef8c97ccabad3601f0ec4541583e29692541c
Author: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelm...@gelma.net>
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 12 16:01:56 2024 +0200
Commit: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
CommitDate: Wed Jun 12 16:53:20 2024 +0200
Fix typo
Change-Id: I59c693c258077fbc36587526901a5453218496ce
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/168736
Tested-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
diff --git a/sw/source/core/undo/rolbck.cxx b/sw/source/core/undo/rolbck.cxx
index 36c1d75d5cb0..56065b4b0c42 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/undo/rolbck.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/undo/rolbck.cxx
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ SwHistorySetAttrSet::SwHistorySetAttrSet(
// The problem with that is that this implies that the two iterators will
advance
// on the same WhichIDs step by step. Even after copying and with the
former
// organization of the Items in ItemSet as fixed array of pointers that is
a
- // 'wild' assumtion, besides that deleting Items while a iterator is used
is
+ // 'wild' assumption, besides that deleting Items while a iterator is used
is
// bad in general, too.
// I re-designed this to iterate over the source ItemSet (rSet) and add
Items
// as needed to the target ItemSet m_OldSet. This is tricky since some
NonShareable
