On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:53:24PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:35 PM, János Uray <uray.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you. > > It's not a happy answer though. > > I hoped that there are at least some little features in the intersection of > > the C++11-knowledge of the supported compilers. > > The most problematic ones are the gcc compiler used on Mac OS X (gcc > 4.0?), and MSVC 2008 compilers.
gcc started implementing C++11 with 4.3, MSVC started relevant partial support with 10.0/11.0. > If you (or someone else equally > interested) are willing to research those two compilers to see what > subset of C++11 features they support (if at all), then I don't see > why we shouldn't use those features. Not even a subset, I fear. Also note the "gcc C++11 ABI is not guaranteed to be C++03 compatible" discussion in the ESC minutes: there are more traps lurking here. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
