Hi, On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:27:44PM +0200, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: > Quoting Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com>: > >>On 09/18/2012 12:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >I'm not sure such a lo.h combining inclusion of multiple other > >header files would be a good idea. With the constant flux across > >our code base, I think aiming at precise, minimal includes is a > >better approach, as it helps achieving minimal rebuilds. > +1 for that. > Was spending hours (!) yesterday during rebuilds with total ccache > misses because of recent header changes.
Agree, for the reasons Stephan described to eloquently. > --disable-cve-tests > CVE unit tests still prevent me from be able to compile LO on > windows with activated antivirus. Someone wanted implement it? Who > was it? Mat M. or me? ;-) http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2012-July/002133.html go for it. > --enable-apps-only="base sw" > if someone is working on one or two apps there is no reason to > rebuild the whole suite all the time. I dont think this warrants to clutter the ./configure-script with. _If_ we implement that, it should be done by having make targets like e.g. "app.base" "app.sw" along with the default "all". After all thats what targets are for. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
