On 12/18/2012 11:55 PM, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
Il 18/12/2012 09:42, Stephan Bergmann ha scritto:
On 12/17/2012 09:15 PM, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
i've refreshed my patch for adding possibility to send SAL_* messages to
syslog. I have two issues:
- am not able to send the ENABLE_SYSLOG definition down to
sal/osl/unx/salinit.cxx

You need to add it to config_host.mk.in to have it visible in
solenv/gbuild/gbuild.mk (or use the newly introduced mechanism of adding
a config/config_*.h that you then include in sal/osl/unx/salinit.cxx,
removing the change from solenv/gbuild/gbuild.mk again).

I've taken the approach suggested by Tor

...in which case you no longer need the change to config_host.mk.in

- if i add calls to SAL_INFO in vcl/headless/headlessinst.cxx like, i
see the fprintf but i don't see the SAL_INFO one. Tried with SAL_WARN,
same result.

Did you configure --enable-dbgutil or at least --enable-debug?

No and that was one of the causes of not seeing them :) why this SAL
messages are shown only on debug build?

This was mainly done because the mechanisms that sal/log.hxx replaces (osl/diagnose.h) did it the same way. Making the logging mechanism is also available in production builds has been discussed on and off, and I guess one day we'll just make it happen. (The biggest fear is probably performance slowdown.)

BTW added a printf in sal_detail_initialize and seeing it called twice
on startup, is it expected?

That's probably one from javaldx and one from soffice.bin (both spawned from oosplash).

Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to