On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > I don't understand why one would want to use the term "class" in the > gbuild context. Isn't that just misleading?
Look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_%28computer_programming%29 "Classes are composed from structural and behavioral constituents." which is _exactly_ what gbuild does in the best way supportable in make. GObject also uses this vocabulary in a non-OOP language and if it wouldnt, it would be even harder to grok the concepts. ;) Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
