On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:16:16PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev <timofeev....@gmail.com> wrote: > Quoting the report: > "It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98". > > So, should we add this flag for libcmis?
Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost, but internal libcmis? Wouldn't it make more sense to tweak the tinderbox to not mix system and internal libraries?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice