On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:57:06AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 08/16/2013 03:46 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 02:55:35PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> No real insight into any of this, but would it make sense to rely on >>> some explicit "commit" stimulus to do that committing, instead of >>> doing it upon "dispose" >> I don't understand what "commit stimulus" is. > I was thinking of some "close" function (analogous to how, say, a > Java class representing a file should have an explicit close() > method rather than relying on a finalizer). It seems the shutdown of ODatabaseContext at "dispose" time creates other problems... E.g. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/69036 So I tried to look into this, and using a "close" that would be called earlier makes sense to me, but in the context of application shutdown, I don't see *who* would call it when :-| I'm a bit stuck there. -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
